That means block storage volumes that are attached directly to an machine running an operating system that drives your filesystem operations. SAN, iSCSI, and local disks are block storage devices. Using S3 FTP: object storage as filesystem You might consider using the SSH File Transfer Protocol (sometimes called SFTP) for that. NOTE: FTP is not a secure protocol and should not be used to transfer sensitive data. Last but not least, you can always optimize Amazon S3’s performance.With Amazon S3, there’s no limit to how much data you can store or when you can access it.
You pay for exactly what you need with no minimum commitments or up-front fees.Amazon S3 is built to provide “ 99.99% availability of objects over a given year.Amazon S3 provides infrastructure that’s “ designed for durability of 99.999999999% of objects.Also, in case you missed it, AWS just announced some new Amazon S3 features during the last edition of re:Invent. Why S3 FTP?Īmazon S3 is reliable and accessible, that’s why. Updated 14/Aug/2019 – streamlined instructions and confirmed that they are still valid and work. However, using this kind of storage requires infrastructure support and can cost you a fair amount of time and money.Ĭould an S3 FTP solution work better? Since AWS’s reliable and competitively priced infrastructure is just sitting there waiting to be used, we were curious to see whether AWS can give us what we need without the administration headache. You might, at some point, have configured an FTP server and used block storage, NAS, or an SAN as your backend. Is it possible to create an S3 FTP file backup/transfer solution, minimizing associated file storage and capacity planning administration headache?įTP (File Transfer Protocol) is a fast and convenient way to transfer large files over the Internet.
0 kommentar(er)
